Nuclear weapons.

Danger Close · Jun 13, 2011

Well, first off, they are in-fact VERY dangerous for some that don't probably know this yet.

The first test of its kind was used by the United States Army on July 16, 1945. Very shortly after, Little Boy and Fat Man were dropped on both Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Causing illnesses, and deformations of the Japanese people, and today are still having the effects of those two nuclear bombs.

Since then I don't think Nuclear Weapons have been used. I guess the question I'm trying to ask is.

Do you think Nuclear Weapons should be done with? As in, there's no alternative for the usage of these massive weapons?

Terrio · Jun 13, 2011

There is no other use for nukes
Every one should get rid of all of them but That wont happen
Since they would be paranoid that the other people didnt get rid of all of them
So In the long run We all will still have massive nukes and Some will be used in the future
But yea I know what you mean They are still having radiation and stuff from the bombs back then

Fafaffy · Jun 13, 2011

I just thought... you know how it's stereotype that Asians have a small penis? Maybe this is why.

OT: I Agree, their should never be a reason to use nuclear weapon.

Danger Close · Jun 13, 2011

Fafaffy said:
I just thought... you know how it's stereotype that Asians have a small penis? Maybe this is why.

OT: I Agree, their should never be a reason to use nuclear weapon.

Not a reason, at all?

TehKevMaster · Jun 13, 2011

I think we should keep nukes. Just incase we need them.

Phantomkiller42 · Jun 13, 2011

Sure you could say you want no one to use nukes, but it doesn't work that way. You could try to make an agreement to have everyone disassemble nukes, but other leaders are going to sign it and later that night be like, fuck that.

People in North Korea are born hating Americans. They would honestly do anything to kill an American.
In school for example they say if you kill 1 American and you kill another American, how many Americans have you killed?
Indoctrination you could say.

Danger Close · Jun 13, 2011

Phantomkiller42 said:
Sure you could say you want no one to use nukes, but it doesn't work that way. You could try to make an agreement to have everyone disassemble nukes, but other leaders are going to sign it and later that night be like, F*ck that.

People in North Korea are born hating Americans. They would honestly do anything to kill an American.
In school for example they say if you kill 1 American and you kill another American, how many Americans have you killed?
Indoctrination you could say.

I see where you're going as for protection, which I agree on. But I'm mainly about anything that wouldn't be used for self-defense.

Manatee · Jun 13, 2011

I'm going to go completely against what everyone would think, and say, people should use them more. The bigger the bomb, the more power you have over everyone else. I like the feeling of when you think it might be your last day. I dunno, I'm weird.

Techno · Jun 13, 2011

They may be developing these constantly, but biowarfare is starting to emerge at a faster rate then you think

Multiply · Jun 13, 2011

If you think about, Nuclear weapons are the basis of world peace as we know it. No one is going to have a world war again any time soon because they are assured of MAD (Mutually assured destruction.).
Of course we should keep them. It is ironic how they are providing peace, but they are.

Inxy · Jun 13, 2011

Yes, I believe nuclear weapons ought to be banned; people need to realize the aftermath a nuclear explosion can cause.

Danger Close · Jun 13, 2011

Although I was expecting the same response, but they are pretty diverse.

My views differ between both. In a sense it could be good within the future, we could be able to probably deflect some type of outer-space object, or we may need it in defense for Earths survival. If we were to disarm our nukes, it's most likely we would have a WW3 in no doubt. Countries wouldn't have to worry about a nuclear warfare to go on, and easily they would have air tactics against anyone. If you've ever watched a fight, you'll know you ALWAYS need to keep your hands up, and if you let your guard down, you'll get knocked out.

Tyler- · Jun 13, 2011

If they are used, they can destroy a whole country.

Danger Close · Jun 13, 2011

Famous™ said:
If they are used, they can destroy a whole country.

They can also save the entire world.

It's like water. It's our savior, but it can also kill us.

Phantomkiller42 · Jun 13, 2011

@"Inxy"

That picture was so disgusting i laughed.

Btw, its the hydrogen bomb now not nuke.

Inxy · Jun 13, 2011

Phantomkiller42 said:
@"Inxy"

That picture was so disgusting i laughed.

Btw, its the hydrogen bomb now not nuke.

You're laughing at a deformed child? I find that really sad.

Mc. Donalds · Jun 13, 2011

Inxy said:
Phantomkiller42 said:

@"Inxy"

That picture was so disgusting i laughed.

Btw, its the hydrogen bomb now not nuke.

Click to expand...

You're laughing at a deformed child? I find that really sad.

Dude that is fucking disgusting.

The fact you can laugh at someone like that, you're sick.

You ought to take a look at yourself and be grateful for what you actually have, a life, unlike that individual who more than likely died.

Will · Jun 13, 2011

Jonathan said:
Inxy said:

Phantomkiller42 said:

@"Inxy"

That picture was so disgusting i laughed.

Btw, its the hydrogen bomb now not nuke.

Click to expand...

You're laughing at a deformed child? I find that really sad.

Click to expand...

Dude that is fucking disgusting.

The fact you can laugh at someone like that, you're sick.

You ought to take a look at yourself and be grateful for what you actually have, a life, unlike that individual who more than likely died.

I laughed too, I'm just a terrible person

Buddy_mybb_import10515 · Jun 14, 2011

WAR said:
Although I was expecting the same response, but they are pretty diverse.

My views differ between both. In a sense it could be good within the future, we could be able to probably deflect some type of outer-space object, or we may need it in defense for Earths survival. If we were to disarm our nukes, it's most likely we would have a WW3 in no doubt. Countries wouldn't have to worry about a nuclear warfare to go on, and easily they would have air tactics against anyone. If you've ever watched a fight, you'll know you ALWAYS need to keep your hands up, and if you let your guard down, you'll get knocked out.

- No country would launch nukes at something coming towards Earth.
- No country would launch nukes at anything approaching the surface, while near or inside of the Earth's atmosphere.

This isn't Armageddon.
- @WW3 - You're taught that nuclear weapons are the number one threat, but they are not that big of a deal. I'm not saying that they are NOT a big deal, but there are other things to worry about.

Danger Close · Jun 14, 2011

- No country would launch nukes at something coming towards Earth.

So you're basing yourself on what YOU think.

- No country would launch nukes at anything approaching the surface, while near or inside of the Earth's atmosphere.

Well I hope not, then we'd have nuclear winter.

This isn't Armageddon.

You're missing the point.

- @WW3 - You're taught that nuclear weapons are the number one threat, but they are not that big of a deal. I'm not saying that they are NOT a big deal, but there are other things to worry about.

Well definitely, but I'm talking about nuclear warfare in general. Mainly because I see good effects towards those weapons.

Nuclear weapons.

Onyx user!

User is banned.

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Member

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Active Member

User is banned.

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Onyx user!

Active Member

Onyx user!

Active Member

Onyx user!

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency