Tempts said:It'd be a challenge, unless the person has valid proof they are speaking to the user in question its hard to ban someone for scamming offsite.
Random said:I'd still be around, so I vote yes.
I'd have FK all to myself.
Divinitive said:I agree with that completely, and if you read my OP more or less, I pretty much said that the user under accusation of scamming offsite needs to have a sufficient amount of proof to prove them as the scammer, Innocent until proven guilty so to speak....
Random said:I'd still be around, so I vote yes.
I'd have FK all to myself.
Hope said:I have a mixed opinion about this. We just simply wouldn't have a lot of people here left in the market and FK's marketplace would eventually die out.
Joy said:Would this be a good idea?
Having strikes.
Let me describe this:
If you scam offsite and get caught, a strike would be put on your account (kinda like DWC) and it is public to see.
If you get caught a certain amount of times you get banned.
The strikes should have a link to the thread where you were caught at.
Just an idea, you can change some stuff up.
Hope you guys like it!
@Hope
@Divinitive
Hope said:Deal with caution is fine for now. Market Korner is also a necessity to this site.
Based Prime said:If you have onsite proof it's the person then it's onsite what the fuck is the point of this thread
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?