Frenzied said:I'm actually looking forward to it. I'm excited for this game even though I know I most likely will be disappointed.
Knight said:Wreck said:F3aRâ„¢ said:Sorry but no can do. If I even did give it to you, you couldn't see past the login page due to it's admin approved. You must email the admin who recommended you to sign up. They will then ask that person and so on. The home page is similar to this one.
If you want more info. Pm me what you want to know.
www.Recoders.org
I honestly don't care if you believe me or not. You're not worth my time "bruh".
Not worth "your time" when there is obviously no such site. If so, it would be out their by now. I highly doubt game dev's from 5+ companies wouldn't all talk to each other over a forum where normal would get accepted as well. This has to be the biggest bullshit by far that I have heard of.
Take a screenshot of one persons comment on that forum and block out their username and everything and I'll believe you. Don't just say it's a waste of time to prove me wrong.. That just makes it sound like you are lying even more.
I have to admit that seems rediculously hollow. Post proof if it actually exists.
Justicar said:You cant rate a game until its been released, lol.
cocopara said:Looks bad IMHO.
COD is all about releasing the same game over and over with tweaks to the maps, looks and weapons. They have used the same graphics engine for like 3-4 editions now without major improvements. The animations look horrible even for a cinematic singleplayer with pre-set animations.
I expect this to be a new COD BlackOps re-packaged and new maps, and it will be praised as being revolutionary
Wouldn't surprise me if this game used a CPU based physics engine.
/Call Of Duty Rant and INB4 GTFO HATER
cocopara said:Trust me, this is the same old engine from MW2 with enhanced physics running on the CPU (like Havoc for Dice) and polish in graphics. Unless they moved to a new engine which doesn't perform better at all
cocopara said:Who said I'm bad. COD MW2 was actually a very nice game to play, however it didn't really bring anything new to the table. Not one time did I classify COD as a bad all-round game I was merely stating my opinion on the advancements in Graphics, physics and effects.
Also never in my post did I ever state that COD wouldn't sell. It is obvious if you look at the amount of 12-13 year old playing it, they account for over 50% of the players, that's common knowledge.
cocopara said:Didn't you just post a trailer?. That looks like Black Ops mixed with MW2 IMHO.
cocopara said:The only area where MW3 can possibly compete with Battlefield is sales and reputation (COD will obviously sell more). However if this is NOT a rushed game and does indeed have mixed contents of Black Ops / MW2 once with some decent physics and a great weapon selection I might consider buying bought BF3 and MW3 as COD is aiming for being Mainstream playable. BF3 requires more intensive specs.
cocopara said:I was basing my opinion on your trailer.
However Activition can't afford to run on a much better engine. Remmember that COD is and has for eternity been Mainstream centric.
It has focused on increasing performance however keep it so low that it can run on older machines. The main reason COD is always re-packaged and there is no TRUE new content is because they can't allow themself to loose a major customer base.
Just saying if you take that into consideration, my opinion doesn't seem so distant