• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

God is real

Executioner

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Cann!bal said:
Elaborate furthermore on how that in any way faith makes personal evidence valid.

Provide me evidence then.

I cant provide evidence since it is my own personal experience, so therefore I proven it to myself.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Executioner said:
I cant provide evidence since it is my own personal experience, so therefore I proven it to myself.

Personal evidence is both invalid to you and everyone else. Please refer to a post of mine below.

Cann!bal said:
A personal experience does not validate one's beliefs in certain god. Personal claims derive from every belief system and religion, with contradictory claims, which god is true is indistinguishable, thus, making personal experiences invalid evidence for you and for everyone.

Personal eye-witness claims regarding theism are unreliable and are devoid of the potential possibility of there being a rational explanation. In experiment, one can see that the after-the-fact evidence and reconstruction of a personal claim is far more reliable than seeing something firsthand. For example; a murder scene. At first not much can be observed, however, with reconstruction of the murder, much more can be seen. This reconstruction would be far more accurate than the personal description of an eye-witness who saw it firsthand.

You can see this firsthand here:

http://youtu.be/IGQmdoK_ZfY

A personal experience in favor of theism would have a rational explanation, in the reconstruction of the event.
 

Executioner

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Cann!bal said:
Personal evidence is both invalid to you and everyone else. Please refer to a post of mine below.

You cant tell someone that his 'personal evidence' is invalid if he/she has proven it to him/her self, not everything in this world has a certain pattern to be followed, its you who detoriate yourself from disbelieving on a creator, so more on you 're trying to belive in 'science' which supposedly was created by someone else... you just cant say that Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla made the universe in fact Nikola Tesla,Galileo Galilei, Rene Descartes, Isaac Newton , Albert Einstein, did belive in God and likewised associated God with their understandings in life.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Executioner said:
You cant tell someone that his 'personal evidence' is invalid if he/she has proven it to him/her self, not everything in this world has a certain pattern to be followed, its you who detoriate yourself from disbelieving on a creator, so more on you 're trying to belive in 'science' which supposedly was created by someone else... you just cant say that Albert Einstein or Nikola Tesla made the universe in fact Nikola Tesla,Galileo Galilei, Rene Descartes, Isaac Newton , Albert Einstein, did belive in God and likewised associated God with their understandings in life.

You blatantly did not view my quote I gave you on personal evidence. I hate your usage of the word disbelief, since it implies proof has been provided and that I am in denial, which is not the case, the contrary in a way. Science was a method created by humans, that's a blatant fact, it's not supposed. I never exclaimed the universe was created by Albert Einstein or Niklo Telsa, silly. Albert Einstein was a different case, he believed in a personal god, which were essentially the laws of physics of the universe. As for the others, they were brilliant, however, primitive and ignorant men, nor do they in anyway boost the significance of god or religion. Plus, 93% of elite scientists today do not believe in a god. If you're going continue to spew repetitive arguments which I have already refuted, I suggest stopping.
 

Mike

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Personally i dont believe in a god cause i choose not to be anyones bitch. But when im classified as an atheist that pisses me off because it sounds like there is a god but i just dont believe in it which when people say they are atheists they are inferring there is a god but they just dont believe in him. I dont believe there is a god and i wish not to be classified as an atheist. The whole religion thing just pisses me off.
 

Nevermind

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Mischief said:
Personally i dont believe in a god cause i choose not to be anyones bitch. But when im classified as an atheist that pisses me off because it sounds like there is a god but i just dont believe in it which when people say they are atheists they are inferring there is a god but they just dont believe in him. I dont believe there is a god and i wish not to be classified as an atheist. The whole religion thing just pisses me off.

Atheism is the rejection of God. When you say that you are an atheist, you are saying that you do not believe that there is a God. What you said about atheists is incorrect.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Leader said:
Atheism is the rejection of religion. When you say that you are an atheist, you are saying that you do not believe that there is a God. What you said about atheists is incorrect.

Atheism is the rejection of a god, not the rejection of a religion. Buddhists don't believe in a god, so they're therefore atheists, however, they are still religious and belong to a religion.

I agree with Mischief on how the atheist label is silly. When I wake in the morning, I don't contemplate myself as being a non-astronomer, non-physicist, non-cosmetologist, so why should there be even be a label for a non-theist? It's pretty silly.
 

Nevermind

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Cann!bal said:
Atheism is the rejection of a god, not the rejection of a religion. Buddhists don't believe in a god, so they're therefore atheists, however, they are still religious and belong to a religion.

Buddhism is not a religion, it's a philosophy. They do not consider themselves as part of a religion. There are Buddhists who are also Catholics. I happen to know a few Buddhists.
 

Cann!bal

Power member.
Reputation
0
Leader said:
Buddhism is not a religion, it's a philosophy. They do not consider themselves as part of a religion. There are Buddhists who are also Catholics. I happen to know a few Buddhists.

They're essentially a religion and classified as religion, you get my point. However, the technicality doesn't refute my manifestation.
 

Nevermind

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Cann!bal said:
They're essentially a religion and classified as religion, you get my point. However, the technicality doesn't refute my manifestation.

I got the message of what you were trying to convey. I used the incorrect word, but the meaning still came across.
 

The SM Legend

User is banned.
Reputation
0
When you see a physical being of god. And or proof he/she exist. Let me know.

God would not let this amount of pain and suffering in the world if he/she were real. I'm not trying to say shit like "you're stupid if you believe in god" Cause I know that i what someone will get out of this.

Life is shit for most people, and the biggest believers in the name of God. Now why would God go ahead and toy with their life? Why would god sit there, knowing of the pain and suffering that that one believer is going through, and let him sit in a shitty life. I think if god were as majestic and all knowing / all seeing and quote on quote, "nice". He/she would help that person.

The image of god is portrayed as a being which knows all, yet tragedies like; the holocaust, 9/11, disease, poverty, HUGE wars, bombings, and more. If god could see it all, has the ability to prevent it, has the ability to send signs to believers. Why not do it? He/she would make the people, the creations, the world, in all generalization, life. So much better. Yet he/she doesn't do it why?

---

That is my belief on god. So much he/she could do and prevent. So much he/she could help with. Nobody in the WORLD has been able to convince me to see that proof of god has been given to the world. I'm an atheist. I always will be. I'm not going AGAINST what you say in any way. I'm giving my view of how I don't see existence of such a super-being is made.
 

Aura

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Godly said:
When you see a physical being of god. And or proof he/she exist. Let me know.

God would not let this amount of pain and suffering in the world if he/she were real. I'm not trying to say shit like "you're stupid if you believe in god" Cause I know that i what someone will get out of this.

Life is shit for most people, and the biggest believers in the name of God. Now why would God go ahead and toy with their life? Why would god sit there, knowing of the pain and suffering that that one believer is going through, and let him sit in a shitty life. I think if god were as majestic and all knowing / all seeing and quote on quote, "nice". He/she would help that person.

The image of god is portrayed as a being which knows all, yet tragedies like; the holocaust, 9/11, disease, poverty, HUGE wars, bombings, and more. If god could see it all, has the ability to prevent it, has the ability to send signs to believers. Why not do it? He/she would make the people, the creations, the world, in all generalization, life. So much better. Yet he/she doesn't do it why?

---

That is my belief on god. So much he/she could do and prevent. So much he/she could help with. Nobody in the WORLD has been able to convince me to see that proof of god has been given to the world. I'm an atheist. I always will be. I'm not going AGAINST what you say in any way. I'm giving my view of how I don't see existence of such a super-being is made.

The point you are trying to make is valid. My answer to you is that divine intervention does not exist. Thats why these things happen, not necessarily that god doesnt exist.

Also, consider this. The universe is extremely vast. Do the research yourself. We on Earth are but a grain of salt. I find it silly and arrogant that people consider us relevant enough for god to dictate and tend to. Anybody with common sense will tell you that certainly there is other life in the universe, intelligent or not. Why would god not make mention of what he did with 99.9999999% of the universe? Why would he create such a universe that has so much potential to house so many other forms of life, a universe that is constantly expanding. Certainly god wouldnt just throw single random planet in there and do nothing with the rest of the universe. What makes us special? Nothing. I can confidently dismiss a god specific to us here on Earth based off of that simple knowledge. Its ridiculous.
 

Michael

Member
Reputation
1
Godly said:
When you see a physical being of god. And or proof he/she exist. Let me know.

God would not let this amount of pain and suffering in the world if he/she were real. I'm not trying to say shit like "you're stupid if you believe in god" Cause I know that i what someone will get out of this.

Life is shit for most people, and the biggest believers in the name of God. Now why would God go ahead and toy with their life? Why would god sit there, knowing of the pain and suffering that that one believer is going through, and let him sit in a shitty life. I think if god were as majestic and all knowing / all seeing and quote on quote, "nice". He/she would help that person.

The image of god is portrayed as a being which knows all, yet tragedies like; the holocaust, 9/11, disease, poverty, HUGE wars, bombings, and more. If god could see it all, has the ability to prevent it, has the ability to send signs to believers. Why not do it? He/she would make the people, the creations, the world, in all generalization, life. So much better. Yet he/she doesn't do it why?

---

That is my belief on god. So much he/she could do and prevent. So much he/she could help with. Nobody in the WORLD has been able to convince me to see that proof of god has been given to the world. I'm an atheist. I always will be. I'm not going AGAINST what you say in any way. I'm giving my view of how I don't see existence of such a super-being is made.

Most of the bad things that happen because God gives us a choice of free will. We are free people, we are not puppets. God does not cause bad things to happen, he loves us and grieves with us in our pain when these bad things occur.

The bible shows a future day in which God will reverse the spiral of our existence. He will do two things that many among many. He will bring justice to the people that have caused havoc in this world. (Psalm 10)

The second thing he will do is a magnificent change to this world so "the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay" (Romans 8:21). God will wipe out every tear from their eyes and there shall be no more death & suffering, crying or pain. The old order of things will be passed away. The resurrection of Jesus is the beginnings of God's restoration of everything.

Remember that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. He is the physical self, God is not a physical being, he is around us. It's only when someone is born again by the Spirit of God that they have genuine, enduring, faith that doesn't need God to be a constant "visible" presence here on earth.
 

The SM Legend

User is banned.
Reputation
0
I still don't believe it.

Oh well.
 

Michael

Member
Reputation
1
Godly said:
I still don't believe it.

Oh well.

That's fine mate! Just don't look at me as trying to shove this stuff down your throat, we all have an opinion. :)
 
Top