Thought's on gay marriage and abortion?

[Paul H.]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Devour, you calm down too

Heterosexual is natural because, well, a penis is biologically meant to go into a vagina to make a baby. Penises have semen, vaginas have eggs, they fit together perfectly. Penises aren't meant to go into assholes. They don't fit, assholes don't have natural lube, it causes cancer and can fuck up the lining if your rectum so that you can't even take a shit anymore.

In the end, sex's primary function is creating kids, not for pleasure. Any biology textbook can tell you that. Hell, animals that die right after sex can tell you that. No better explanation then that.

Just because something feels good doesn't mean it is good. Life isn't about sexual pleasure. Anyone who believes that should be smacked upside the head.

 

[Descend]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

You make good points, and I agree with your view on this whole topic altogether. I just challenged a few of your words for the sake of debate. Sorry if I came off strong haha

 

[Cann!bal]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Just because pedophilia is sick, you're going to deny them to right to have sex with their kids? Just because incest can cause genetic disorders due to inbreeding, we should deny them equal rights?

There is an exception in this particular case.

There's no "gay" or "straight" gene in your DNA. You're not born gay. It's a mental thing. Are people born pedophiles? No, it's a mental issue affecting sexual attraction. Now, I'm not saying homosexuals are pedophiles but I'm just saying it's a mental health thing.

It's curious the way people for LGBT work. They think that you're born being straight or gay (a mental thing) and it's permanent and we shouldn't try to change them, yet they say that that having a dick or a pussy (a physical thing) can be changed.

Read this article, please.

http://www.redding.com/news/2008/jun/17/are-we-born-gay-science-suggests-yes/

 

[Descend]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Why is there an exception for this? Because it has become more socially exceptable over recent years? See when you start making exceptions for certain "groups" if you will, that's when shit gets tricky.

 

[Paul H.]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

There is an exception in this particular case.

Why is there an exception?

Read this article, please.

http://www.redding.com/news/2008/jun/17/are-we-born-gay-science-suggests-yes/

If there was a gay gene, all identical twins would have to both be either gay or straight. Also: "Twin studies have received a number of criticisms including self-selection bias where homosexuals with gay siblings are more likely to volunteer for studies. Nonetheless, it is possible to conclude that, given the difference in sexuality in so many sets of identical twins, sexual orientation cannot be purely caused by genetics".

 

[Cann!bal]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

If there was a gay gene, all identical twins would have to both be either gay or straight. Also: "Twin studies have received a number of criticisms including self-selection bias where homosexuals with gay siblings are more likely to volunteer for studies. Nonetheless, it is possible to conclude that, given the difference in sexuality in so many sets of identical twins, sexual orientation cannot be purely caused by genetics".

I wasn't trying to address that idea. I was trying to point out that some people are born gay and can't help themselves. Also, some people might not even know they're gay and live a heterosexual lifestyle.

"Sexuality is about as much a “choice” as handedness is.

As recently as the last century, teachers would tie a child’s left hand in a vain attempt to make them right-handed. While a left-handed person can force himself to write right-handed, just as a gay person can force himself to live a heterosexual lifestyle, that doesn’t make the leftie a rightie or the gay man straight. Some people (the ambidextrous or the bisexual) would find it relatively easy to move from one behavior to the other, but for most of us, changing our sexuality would be as impossible as learning to write as precisely or throw a ball as accurately with our non-dominant hand as with our dominant hand.

Science doesn’t have “proof” as to what causes left-handedness, either. Like sexuality, it is probably a combination of genetics and in utero environmental factors, reinforced in early childhood by societal norms. But it’s clear that both are most likely fixed at birth."

 

[Sleep]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

i think they should be able to be miserable like the rest of us

 

[Paul H.]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I wasn't trying to address that idea. I was trying to point out that some people are born gay and can't help themselves. Also, some people might not even know they're gay and live a heterosexual lifestyle.

Pedophile's sometimes can't help themselves, should they still be allowed to do their unnatural act?

 

[Bubba]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

If there was a gay gene, all identical twins would have to both be either gay or straight. Also: "Twin studies have received a number of criticisms including self-selection bias where homosexuals with gay siblings are more likely to volunteer for studies. Nonetheless, it is possible to conclude that, given the difference in sexuality in so many sets of identical twins, sexual orientation cannot be purely caused by genetics".

There's actual scientific information on twins where one is gay and the other is not. It's Nature and Nurture. (This is to Paul)

OT: Some people inherit the genes of homosexuality, which hasn't been proven, and some have just been raised underneath it and find it to be normal, alright, and actually adjust to the lifestyle. There's nothing set in stone saying someone is born with certain interests, it's developed in different ways. As well as marriage is when two are in love with each other, so why in the hell do people want to stop that? They're at a mature age by the time they'd like to get married, I see nothing inappropriate about that.

 

[Cann!bal]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Why is there an exception?

There is an exception for gays, because they aren't hurting anyone else unlike pedophiles.

Pedophile's sometimes can't help themselves, should they still be allowed to do their unnatural act?

Pedophiles, no. Gays, yes. Why? Because like how I stated before, they aren't harming anyone with their sexuality.

 

[Finland]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I am against this ... I just don't think it's rigght

 

[Cann!bal]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I am against this ... I just don't think it's rigght

Could you explain your reasoning why you believe it isn't right in further detail, please?

 

[paul]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I support gay marriage but by saying that I should also say, I have no clue why people care so much if a man and a man or women and a women get married. Their marriage is not affecting anyone.

 

[Finland]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

idk Cannibal I'm not trying to be mean I just don't support ir

 

[Cann!bal]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I support gay marriage but by saying that I should also say, I have no clue why people care so much if a man and a man or women and a women get married. Their marriage is not affecting anyone.

I don't understand why it's such a big deal either. Too many homophobes in politics, perhaps? I'm joking. But even ancient Rome and ancient Greece use to allow same-sex marriage. The Roman emperor Nero married a partner of the same-sex. Even the Greek philosopher Plato was gay. Same-sex marriages were common then, why not now? I think the rise of Christianity ruined it.

 

[Too School For Cool]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve!

 

[Descend]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

God didn't make shit nigga

 

[Superior]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

I support gay marriage but I believe Paul H. Is right about homosexuals having something wrong with their brain processing. Humans are designed mentally and physically to be attracted and conceive with the opposite sex... Nuff said.

 

[Paul H.]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Homosexuals do hurt other people... their sex partners. Is it responsible to have sex with someone if you know you're going to hurt them e.g. if you have an STD? What if you know that homosexual sex is also physically bad? http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/

 

[tuffguy2006]

RE: Thought's on gay marriage?

Homosexuals do hurt other people... their sex partners. Is it responsible to have sex with someone if you know you're going to hurt them e.g. if you have an STD? What if you know that homosexual sex is also physically bad? http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/

That article doesn't seem biased at all.
Anyways, I'm a little torn on the idea. I do believe homosexuals should be allowed to get the legal benefits of marriage but I also can understand that people are afraid of change. The real reason for all of the anti-homosexuality is discrimination towards people that are different. Just like how the african-americans rose out of slavery the homosexuals will rise out of this.