• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

True or not?

Reputation
0
The Elite. I beg you not to change your font or font size, next time.
Mike is right, though.
Voice your opinion but in a way, where there is little room for drama.
Any user that constantly argues should face, some sort of consequence.
 
Reputation
0
It seems to be the same culprits in each thread that are starting it. Starts off with one user posting where his/her opinion isnt wanted (it happens everywhere and is almost impossible to stop. Even in RL), everyone flames him. Someone else will come into back him/her up. Then a war of the monkey shit throwing begins.

Not saying names, but I think we all get the drift.

Things need to be re evaluated so that this forum can move forward.
 
Reputation
0
Michael, I could not agree with you more.
Every single sentence speaks the truth and The Elite should take the last one into action.
 
Reputation
0
michaelkr1 said:
It seems to be the same culprits in each thread that are starting it. Starts off with one user posting where his/her opinion isnt wanted (it happens everywhere and is almost impossible to stop. Even in RL), everyone flames him. Someone else will come into back him/her up. Then a war of the monkey shit throwing begins.

Not saying names, but I think we all get the drift.

Things need to be re evaluated so that this forum can move forward.

I haven't said anything.. Just letting time go by.
 
Reputation
0
Your name wasnt the one I was thinking of George ;). It was another user who has recently rejoined the forum. Ohh and funny that when did all this shit start. Was it when he rejoined? Fuck my name should be Sherlock Holmes.
 

Mc. Donalds

Active Member
Reputation
0
I couldn't agree more Michael. Fair enough I have caused a bit recently but TE instead of telling us, the people trying to stop it, shut up, why don't you go deal with the perpetrators instead of letting them get away with it...
 

Mc. Donalds

Active Member
Reputation
0
Just look at their posts, you know who I'm talking about. I do report them! but ADL is normally the only one online and so because it's him and Carbon doing it he marks them as read because he's biased. See my point yet?

Also could you reply to my PM please.
 
Reputation
0
How about for a nice democratic solution, @[The Elite] makes a poll for Carbon to be banned or stay unbanned? That way the members speak. No bias results. Just a simple poll. Because we all saw it, as much as it was denied, that Carbon was unbanned at the end of his original ban. Came back and acted like a massive twat then got banned again till September 2nd (I still remember the date on the bans page. Thanks to photographic memory). Then due to him being so loved by "higher up", he was unbanned. You can't get a more bias result than that. Let the people speak.
 
Reputation
0
I like Michaels idea, Atleast it would show what the members want.
 

EAF

Active Member
Reputation
0
Kind of reminds me of the time of world war ii, nobody would say anything about Hitler, because if they did, they would die.

All a big dictatorship.
 

Mc. Donalds

Active Member
Reputation
0
Platinum, I agree.
I stand for what I believe in and I'll be fucked if some-one tries to change it.
 

Multiply

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Wow...
I don't want to say too much about my own opinion, but seriously, Management, look what people are saying..
They are comparing this simple forum about a shitty java game to WW2 and the Nazi regime... something must be going a bit wrong? People are begging to have the chance to vote, the chance to sign a petition, the chance to do anything they can.
These members who are complaining haven't just joined RuneGear, nor have they just been lurking. They have been trying their hardest to push forward RuneGear over the months. Some have thousands of posts, they have hosted contests, they write articles, they bring activity to the marketplace, they run groups. They are the heart of RuneGear. You must listen to your heart.

@[The Elite] @[Dykerosoft] @[Mike]
 

RAF

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
michaelkr1 said:
How about for a nice democratic solution, @[The Elite] makes a poll for Carbon to be banned or stay unbanned? That way the members speak. No bias results. Just a simple poll. Because we all saw it, as much as it was denied, that Carbon was unbanned at the end of his original ban. Came back and acted like a massive twat then got banned again till September 2nd (I still remember the date on the bans page. Thanks to photographic memory). Then due to him being so loved by "higher up", he was unbanned. You can't get a more bias result than that. Let the people speak.

Yes, I'll make a poll to get a member because he trolls. So, let's ban all other members who troll AND who have had their ban ended early, that's about 20 other people. The thing is, many of you don't understand that when you do something to one, you must do it to everyone or it's counted as abuse. Carbon's ban was unfair actually since it was a 2month ban for trolling which is not worthy, hence why he was unbanned after a week. This is a democracy, but voting against someone is not democratic, it's stupid and ludicrious.
 

RAF

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Platinum Sif said:
Kind of reminds me of the time of world war ii, nobody would say anything about Hitler, because if they did, they would die.

All a big dictatorship.

How is this a big dictatorship? No one is abusing you or anyone else, it's ridiculous.

Jonathan said:
Platinum, I agree.
I stand for what I believe in and I'll be fucked if some-one tries to change it.

This a forum for the love of God. Stop blowing shit out of proportion, we all know you've done this before and continue to do it. Your signature gets changed once and then you know shit is going down. No one is attempting to change your opinion. You people are complaining for the sake of complaining. I still don't see what has happened, you're all complaining because a member was unbanned earlier. If so, then that's just ridiculous and so elementary.
 
Reputation
0
The Elite said:
michaelkr1 said:
How about for a nice democratic solution, @[The Elite] makes a poll for Carbon to be banned or stay unbanned? That way the members speak. No bias results. Just a simple poll. Because we all saw it, as much as it was denied, that Carbon was unbanned at the end of his original ban. Came back and acted like a massive twat then got banned again till September 2nd (I still remember the date on the bans page. Thanks to photographic memory). Then due to him being so loved by "higher up", he was unbanned. You can't get a more bias result than that. Let the people speak.

Yes, I'll make a poll to get a member because he trolls. So, let's ban all other members who troll AND who have had their ban ended early, that's about 20 other people. The thing is, many of you don't understand that when you do something to one, you must do it to everyone or it's counted as abuse. Carbon's ban was unfair actually since it was a 2month ban for trolling which is not worthy, hence why he was unbanned after a week. This is a democracy, but voting against someone is not democratic, it's stupid and ludicrious.
If you banned everyone who trolled, this forum would be dead, because everyone trolls once in a while.
 

Multiply

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
The Elite said:
michaelkr1 said:
How about for a nice democratic solution, @[The Elite] makes a poll for Carbon to be banned or stay unbanned? That way the members speak. No bias results. Just a simple poll. Because we all saw it, as much as it was denied, that Carbon was unbanned at the end of his original ban. Came back and acted like a massive twat then got banned again till September 2nd (I still remember the date on the bans page. Thanks to photographic memory). Then due to him being so loved by "higher up", he was unbanned. You can't get a more bias result than that. Let the people speak.

Yes, I'll make a poll to get a member because he trolls. So, let's ban all other members who troll AND who have had their ban ended early, that's about 20 other people. The thing is, many of you don't understand that when you do something to one, you must do it to everyone or it's counted as abuse. Carbon's ban was unfair actually since it was a 2month ban for trolling which is not worthy, hence why he was unbanned after a week. This is a democracy, but voting against someone is not democratic, it's stupid and ludicrious.

May I just ask out of interest, who else has had a ban ended early?
 

RAF

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Multiply said:
Wow...
I don't want to say too much about my own opinion, but seriously, Management, look what people are saying..
They are comparing this simple forum about a shitty java game to WW2 and the Nazi regime... something must be going a bit wrong? People are begging to have the chance to vote, the chance to sign a petition, the chance to do anything they can.
These members who are complaining haven't just joined RuneGear, nor have they just been lurking. They have been trying their hardest to push forward RuneGear over the months. Some have thousands of posts, they have hosted contests, they write articles, they bring activity to the marketplace, they run groups. They are the heart of RuneGear. You must listen to your heart.

@[The Elite] @[Dykerosoft] @[Mike]

I can compare your post to Rebecca Black's Friday video. All of a sudden, something must be wrong with your post.

I'm sick of everyone saying, "Listen to your members", since the fact is, everyone who posts that has never run/managed a forum. To begin with, you can't listen to everyone, especially 5k+ members. Furthermore, you need to be assertive, you can't satisfy every single one of their (unecessary sometimes) needs.

Not to be rude or hate the community, but when one member leaves, it's not a permanenet thing, another member comes back. Same with Rune Gear, if RG goes away, there's another forum for others to go to.
 
Top