• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Why do sponsers have such high reputation effects

Status
Not open for further replies.

Relapse

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Ireppgold said:
Normal members shouldn't even be able to give rep, that's rediculous.

q4t

@"Carbon"

idk why he didn't take your RSGP but i paid 32M in RSGP for sponsor
 

Reaper_mybb_import12521

Active Member
Reputation
0
PedoBear said:
I disagree, you shell out 25$ for Sponsor, you should get something more than a flashy userbar.
$25 or 30m+ we should get a little bit of rep. If we abuse it we get banned.

/account
 
Reputation
0
Carbon said:
Steezy said:
Carbon said:
Wrong, it's not available to buy for everyone. Not everyone has the capability to fork over 40$+ for all the upgrades. In turn, the abundance of immaturity that plagues our upgraded users dampens the total forum status down to a few children bickering.

Now who would want to stay or even want to upgrade in a forum like that?

Look at HackForums....

Why not just give the Mods more reputation power rather than lowering the rest?

It would balance it out.

To feed our already "power-hungry" mindsets? No thanks.

Also, The Elite refused to take my RSGP for any upgrades, and a group creation. I myself cannot use paypal, so that avenue of payment is out of the window.

I don't get what you are saying?

I meant Super Mods.

I honestly think the reputation system is fine as it is, but I do believe Super Mods should have a little more reputation power.
 

Tyler-

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Na elite should still be -3 +3, maybe put super mods up to 5 or 6
 

Singed

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
regular member: 1
elite: 2
sponsor: 4
developer: 4?
moderator: 5
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10
That's what I think would be more balanced seeming you pay a lot less for elite.
 
Reputation
0
wtf, development should get anything, there just like the group "writers" and i dont see them in that list.

regular member: 0
elite: 3
sponsor: 4
moderator: 4- i dont see why it should be able to give more rep.
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10
 

Michael

Member
Reputation
1
Ireppgold said:
wtf, development should get anything, there just like the group "writers" and i dont see them in that list.

regular member: 0
elite: 3
sponsor: 4
moderator: 4- i dont see why it should be able to give more rep.
super moderator: 6
management: 8-10

We give +3's, what you talking about?

Regular: 1
RG Elite: 3
Sponsor: 3
Moderator: 4
Staff: 4
Management: 6.
 
Reputation
0
elite and sponsor both give +3? wtf rofl, then why buy sponsor o_O?
 
Reputation
0
Oxide said:
Normal - 1
Elite - 3
Sponsor - 4
Mod - 5
Staff - 6
Management 8-10

Simple, everyone's happy then.
if normal- 0, then its mad.
 
Reputation
0
Ireppgold said:
elite and sponsor both give +3? wtf rofl, then why buy sponsor o_O?

If people are buying Sponsor for reputation power, than that is pathetic.

This all seems unnecessary as the reputation system is fine as it is. Maybe the Super Mods should gain an extra point or two, but the rest are fine.

Whatever happens, doesn't really matter as reputation does nothing for someone.
 

RAF

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Carbon said:
PedoBear said:
I disagree, you shell out 25$ for Sponsor, you should get something more than a flashy userbar.

Other then the recognition for donating? Tad bit selfish isn't it?

If you're the one paying for the server, then fine, do what you want. But if someone is donating $25, then the least they can have is give a +4. Don't try to get their permissions lessened, as they deserve the least bit of permissions.
 

Bmthrules

Power member.
Reputation
0
The Elite said:
Carbon said:
PedoBear said:
I disagree, you shell out 25$ for Sponsor, you should get something more than a flashy userbar.

Other then the recognition for donating? Tad bit selfish isn't it?

If you're the one paying for the server, then fine, do what you want. But if someone is donating $25, then the least they can have is give a +4. Don't try to get their permissions lessened, as they deserve the least bit of permissions.

Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
 

Fawkes

Member
Reputation
0
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
 

Reaper_mybb_import12521

Active Member
Reputation
0
Fawkes said:
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
Normal members giving +1/-1 is fine imo.


Carbon said:
Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
No? I think it's fine how it is. Donate more, get more permissions. And, Mod/Staff already get a special bonus.
 

Bmthrules

Power member.
Reputation
0
Reaper said:
Fawkes said:
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
Normal members giving +1/-1 is fine imo.


Carbon said:
Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
No? I think it's fine how it is. Donate more, get more permissions. And, Mod/Staff already get a special bonus.

You're a sponser, conflict of interests.
 

Reaper_mybb_import12521

Active Member
Reputation
0
Yeah, and it cost A LOT, therefore we deserve it.
Carbon said:
Reaper said:
Fawkes said:
So how much do normal members like me get to give people? +1?
Maybe the higher YOUR rep the more/less rep you can give?
Normal members giving +1/-1 is fine imo.


Carbon said:
Then even out the rest of the groups "permissions"
No? I think it's fine how it is. Donate more, get more permissions. And, Mod/Staff already get a special bonus.

You're a sponser, conflict of interests.
 

Rainy_

Member
Reputation
0
Reaper said:
Yeah, and it cost A LOT, therefore we deserve it.
Carbon said:
Reaper said:
Normal members giving +1/-1 is fine imo.


No? I think it's fine how it is. Donate more, get more permissions. And, Mod/Staff already get a special bonus.

You're a sponser, conflict of interests.


You claim "It cost's a lot", yet in your signature it thanks Inxy for FUNDING your sponsor? bigspenda.


I think it's rather funny how all the Sponsor's agree with the current system, the only people who don't agree are the people who aren't..
 

Reaper_mybb_import12521

Active Member
Reputation
0
Rainy_ said:
Reaper said:
Yeah, and it cost A LOT, therefore we deserve it.
Carbon said:
You're a sponser, conflict of interests.


You claim "It cost's a lot", yet in your signature it thanks Inxy for FUNDING your sponsor? bigspenda.


I think it's rather funny how all the Sponsor's agree with the current system, the only people who don't agree are the people who aren't..


Because it benefits them. And, it cost HIM a lot, so it still cost a lot. And, we don't want to be ripped off the major amount of $/RSGP spent.

Why is the system frowned upon by you guys anyway?
 

Touche

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Rainy_ said:
You claim "It cost's a lot", yet in your signature it thanks Inxy for FUNDING your sponsor? bigspenda.


I think it's rather funny how all the Sponsor's agree with the current system, the only people who don't agree are the people who aren't..



Because if you paid $25, you would want the extra permissions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top