• Welcome to ForumKorner!
    Join today and become a part of the community.

Rule #6.

fatMatch

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
6. Scamming is not tolerated, neither are tutorials portraying how to scam.

This is obviously a very key rule in a community like RuneGear that essentially revolves around Black Market RuneScape trading. Without such a rule in place, people would get scammed and leave the forums. RuneGear wouldn't be as large or nearly as great a community as it is today without such a rule in place.


Dykerosoft said:
That's why selling gold is awful :/

Sorry, but all scammers are treated the same, we cant make exceptions.


NOW,
I understand that all scammers must be treated the same and exceptions cannot be made. That is exactly what I like to see in a community: equality.
However, when someone is caught scamming it seems that they do not receive a permanent ban.

Now I ask you:
What the hell is the point of even having a Rule 6 in place if breaking it just gets you a nice little vacation away from the forums?
A: That's right, you've guessed it. There is no point, as rule 6 has obviously become completely and entirely redundant.


When a new member comes to the forums with the intention to scam and sees that actions towards scammers are lenient and do not include a permanent ban; what are they going to think?
A: They're going to think something along the lines of "F*CK YES! I've found a safe haven. Even if these guys are all dope, I can scam one of them, then come back to post with them at a later date."


When a new member with good intentions and the desire to join a good, relatively scam-free community shows up here, what will cross their mind?
A: "So I've found a community that tolerates scamming to some degree, where even a staff member was not permanently banned after being caught scamming. I think I'll take my business elsewhere, to give myself the best shot at not being scammed."


RuneGear is a constantly growing expanding community that we all care about.
I want to see it flourish and be around for many years to come. To continue such healthy development, there can be zero tolerance for scamming. There must be permanent bans for those who are caught scamming, no exceptions.

I've had experience as staff on a couple of different RuneScape forums. Though that was several years ago, I did learn a lot. Though those forums are no longer around, the reason they lasted as long as they did was because we were able to keep scammers out.

As RuneGear continues to grow, it is essential that scammers are kept out of the community. I have seen scamming plague communities time and time again, leading to eventual emigration and/or abandonment by most of the members.
I realize that scamming isn't really a common theme on RuneGear yet. But as the amount of active members keeps pushing up it will become a problem, which is why it would be beneficial to begin cracking down now.

So if it wasn't already obvious, my suggestion to the staff of RuneGear is to make bans for scamming permanent. No Exceptions.
That is all, thank you for your time.
 
Reputation
0
I totally agree with this. The tolerance on scammers should be 0. You scam, you ban. Erm you scam, you get banned.
 

Terrio

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Agree should be perm banned And I garentee staff will close this before I get a chance to post this comment
 
Reputation
0
Dungeoneering said:
Agree should be perm banned And I garentee staff will close this before I get a chance to post this comment

*awkward*
 
Reputation
0
Definitely, They only get a 3 month ban atm, Sad imo.
 

Terrio

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Gum said:
Dungeoneering said:
Agree should be perm banned And I garentee staff will close this before I get a chance to post this comment

*awkward*

Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like Fuck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm
 
Reputation
0
Dungeoneering said:
Gum said:
Dungeoneering said:
Agree should be perm banned And I garentee staff will close this before I get a chance to post this comment

*awkward*

Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Haha hate that. Woohoo we still stand!

Could a staff member please comment?
 

Dykerosoft

Active Member
Reputation
0
Dungeoneering said:
Gum said:
Dungeoneering said:
Agree should be perm banned And I garentee staff will close this before I get a chance to post this comment

*awkward*

Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.
 
Reputation
0
Dykerosoft said:
Dungeoneering said:
Gum said:
*awkward*

Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Could you please address the OP?
 

Dykerosoft

Active Member
Reputation
0
Gum said:
Dykerosoft said:
Dungeoneering said:
Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Could you please address the OP?

If you want my opinion, I agree. However, I don't make the rules, I enforce them.
 
Reputation
0
I sort of agree with this, some people need a second chance.. anyone I haven't been on in a while, wanted to say grats to Dykersoft for reaching Management.
 
Reputation
0
Method said:
I sort of agree with this, some people need a second chance.. anyone I haven't been on in a while, wanted to say grats to Dykersoft for reaching Management.

I THINK it's only temporary, Honestly? I'm not entirely sure.
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
Dykerosoft said:
Dungeoneering said:
Gum said:
*awkward*

Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Go look at every thread ADW has closed.
 

All Day Win

Onyx user!
Reputation
0
Justin said:
Dykerosoft said:
Dungeoneering said:
Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Go look at every thread ADW has closed.

You seem upset. I close threads because you keep constantly flaming and spamming my threads so theres no point in arguing with a butt hurt child. So I might as well close it.
 

Terrio

User is banned.
Reputation
0
Justin said:
Dykerosoft said:
Dungeoneering said:
Yea I have been talking in threads laitly that staff rage close them before I can type what I gota say so I was like F*ck that Dykersoft is viewing this thread He might close it or w.e and I didn't want to was a 1000word rant on how it should be a perm

Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Go look at every thread ADW has closed.
^

Staff do sometimes rage close threads and I see dreclin get banned like 3 times a day Soo Idk if there is a excuse for that one

Any who back on topic What does The elite think about every one wanting that rule changed?
 
Reputation
0
Dykerosoft said:
Gum said:
Dykerosoft said:
Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Could you please address the OP?

If you want my opinion, I agree. However, I don't make the rules, I enforce them.

As management you should have some rule authority. But either way nice to know your opinion.
 

Manatee

Active Member
Reputation
0
All Day Win said:
Justin said:
Dykerosoft said:
Staff members don't "rage close" threads. We close threads that need to be closed.

Go look at every thread ADW has closed.

You seem upset. I close threads because you keep constantly flaming and spamming my threads so theres no point in arguing with a butt hurt child. So I might as well close it.

"Long live the alliance" -closes thread.
 

Dykerosoft

Active Member
Reputation
0
Justin said:
All Day Win said:
Justin said:
Go look at every thread ADW has closed.

You seem upset. I close threads because you keep constantly flaming and spamming my threads so theres no point in arguing with a butt hurt child. So I might as well close it.

"Long live the alliance" -closes thread.

Please stay on topic.
 
Top